<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 360 vs PS3 - disc formats</title>
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/</link>
	<description>PS3 News and Views</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/#comment-417</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/#comment-417</guid>
					<description>Never thought of that. I guess some publishers would take the cost trade-off if it means less piracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never thought of that. I guess some publishers would take the cost trade-off if it means less piracy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/#comment-416</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/#comment-416</guid>
					<description>I wouldn't be suprised if many games are released on BD even if they are small simply to reduce piracy.

One technique that SHOULD be used is to bloat the data as much as possible (ie, hash code and require checks every second). 50GB of data would be difficult to pirate online and BD recorders will be scarse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be suprised if many games are released on BD even if they are small simply to reduce piracy.</p>
<p>One technique that SHOULD be used is to bloat the data as much as possible (ie, hash code and require checks every second). 50GB of data would be difficult to pirate online and BD recorders will be scarse.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/#comment-415</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/#comment-415</guid>
					<description>Good point. Cost is currently one of the big things Toshiba is selling about HD-DVD vs Blu-ray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. Cost is currently one of the big things Toshiba is selling about HD-DVD vs Blu-ray.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/#comment-414</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2005/10/31/360-vs-ps3-disc-formats/#comment-414</guid>
					<description>A small correction here... the N64's largest capicity cartridge was Resident Evil 2, at 512 Megabits, which is only 64 Megabytes.  Most games were 8 - 16 Megabytes!!  This was a major factor in N64's loss to the PS1, but possibly even more important was manufacturing costs of cartridges vs. CDs.  It was much riskier for publishers to produce expensive cartridges as opposed to cheap CDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small correction here&#8230; the N64&#8217;s largest capicity cartridge was Resident Evil 2, at 512 Megabits, which is only 64 Megabytes.  Most games were 8 - 16 Megabytes!!  This was a major factor in N64&#8217;s loss to the PS1, but possibly even more important was manufacturing costs of cartridges vs. CDs.  It was much riskier for publishers to produce expensive cartridges as opposed to cheap CDs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
