<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony thinks Online</title>
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/01/19/sony-thinks-online/</link>
	<description>PS3 News and Views</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: observer</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/01/19/sony-thinks-online/#comment-979</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/01/19/sony-thinks-online/#comment-979</guid>
					<description>Translation: "No new news". There are still no announcements detailing online functionality and Sony is still keeping their plans and progress (or lack thereof) private.

It's strange that for a no news event, many people went from "Sony has no online strategy" to "Sony is just starting to eye Xbox Live features".

Nothing has changed except the winds of the rumor mill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation: &#8220;No new news&#8221;. There are still no announcements detailing online functionality and Sony is still keeping their plans and progress (or lack thereof) private.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s strange that for a no news event, many people went from &#8220;Sony has no online strategy&#8221; to &#8220;Sony is just starting to eye Xbox Live features&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nothing has changed except the winds of the rumor mill.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Crazy Phat</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/01/19/sony-thinks-online/#comment-978</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/01/19/sony-thinks-online/#comment-978</guid>
					<description>I thinki they took them off because those were probably the lauch titles and was probably never meant to be released</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thinki they took them off because those were probably the lauch titles and was probably never meant to be released
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Black Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/01/19/sony-thinks-online/#comment-974</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/01/19/sony-thinks-online/#comment-974</guid>
					<description>Sony should have save themselves the trouble and asked directly, "What features of Xbox Live do you want us to bite of off." Immitations is the best form of flattery iGuess.

I actually received that survey a while ago but never took the time to respond. This sounds  like Xbox Live and iDoubt it will be free. Putting something like that together and supporting it costs a lot of money. I'm curious as to how all this will be impletmented because many of the Xbox Live methods are patented. I heard an interview w/ one of the developers and iSurprised as to how complex the underlying functions really are; matchmaking especially.

Anyway, It appears MS was on to something w/ a centralized paid service after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony should have save themselves the trouble and asked directly, &#8220;What features of Xbox Live do you want us to bite of off.&#8221; Immitations is the best form of flattery iGuess.</p>
<p>I actually received that survey a while ago but never took the time to respond. This sounds  like Xbox Live and iDoubt it will be free. Putting something like that together and supporting it costs a lot of money. I&#8217;m curious as to how all this will be impletmented because many of the Xbox Live methods are patented. I heard an interview w/ one of the developers and iSurprised as to how complex the underlying functions really are; matchmaking especially.</p>
<p>Anyway, It appears MS was on to something w/ a centralized paid service after all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
