<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazing PS3 Details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/11/amazing-ps3-details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/11/amazing-ps3-details/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/11/amazing-ps3-details/#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/11/amazing-ps3-details/#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>Interesting article but I&#039;ll remain skeptical as well. However, the article does site many logical points. For example, the part in which it was stated that developers r experiencing difficulty producing a solid framerate in 1080p. That was something iPredicted when the spec of the PS3 was initially announced; espeically w/ the dual 1080p output. iDon&#039;t believe the PS3 has enough RAM to do that. Its processing power is not so relevant &#039;cuz there is not way a developer can coax a game to run @ those resolutions within the limitations of the memory while sporting a level of visual sophistication we all realisticly expect from this generation. Even if it was possible, the bandwidth required between components would b enourmous and iDoubt the PS3 can support it outside of simpler games. 

Sony might have made a problem 4 themselves in this regard though. A lot of PS fans r not objective enough to understand that the E3 videos where promotional videos intended to generate hype. Many will b expecting the games to look that good; either @ launch or sometime in the future. iPersonally don&#039;t expect to c visuals @ the level of Killzone &amp; Motorstorm until the next generation. A present time, the resources required to produce a quality game at that level - assuming its possible now - will b prohibitavely expensive 4 even the largest developers.

The generation gap between the X360 &amp; the PS3 will not be as great as Sony would like many to believe. The PS3 is launching later therefore it is expected to sport better guts &amp; eventually the PS3 could theoretically pull away but not by any signficant margin. But will it really matter? PS2 was lacking compared to GC &amp; the &#039;box but it still represented relentlessly like there was no end. The way iLook @ it, both systems have their advantages &amp; disadvantages when compared. The X360 has more general CPU power but the PS3 has its SPE to offset that somewhat. iGuess we&#039;ll will find out 4 years from now when these systems r being pressed to the limits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article but I&#8217;ll remain skeptical as well. However, the article does site many logical points. For example, the part in which it was stated that developers r experiencing difficulty producing a solid framerate in 1080p. That was something iPredicted when the spec of the PS3 was initially announced; espeically w/ the dual 1080p output. iDon&#8217;t believe the PS3 has enough RAM to do that. Its processing power is not so relevant &#8216;cuz there is not way a developer can coax a game to run @ those resolutions within the limitations of the memory while sporting a level of visual sophistication we all realisticly expect from this generation. Even if it was possible, the bandwidth required between components would b enourmous and iDoubt the PS3 can support it outside of simpler games. </p>
<p>Sony might have made a problem 4 themselves in this regard though. A lot of PS fans r not objective enough to understand that the E3 videos where promotional videos intended to generate hype. Many will b expecting the games to look that good; either @ launch or sometime in the future. iPersonally don&#8217;t expect to c visuals @ the level of Killzone &amp; Motorstorm until the next generation. A present time, the resources required to produce a quality game at that level &#8211; assuming its possible now &#8211; will b prohibitavely expensive 4 even the largest developers.</p>
<p>The generation gap between the X360 &amp; the PS3 will not be as great as Sony would like many to believe. The PS3 is launching later therefore it is expected to sport better guts &amp; eventually the PS3 could theoretically pull away but not by any signficant margin. But will it really matter? PS2 was lacking compared to GC &amp; the &#8216;box but it still represented relentlessly like there was no end. The way iLook @ it, both systems have their advantages &amp; disadvantages when compared. The X360 has more general CPU power but the PS3 has its SPE to offset that somewhat. iGuess we&#8217;ll will find out 4 years from now when these systems r being pressed to the limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiro</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/11/amazing-ps3-details/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/11/amazing-ps3-details/#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very skeptical, not of what the PlayStation 3, but how genuine that article is.

Kikizo isn&#039;t the most reliable source to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very skeptical, not of what the PlayStation 3, but how genuine that article is.</p>
<p>Kikizo isn&#8217;t the most reliable source to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

