<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PS3 HDD?</title>
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/13/ps3-hdd/</link>
	<description>PS3 News and Views</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Black Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/13/ps3-hdd/#comment-1249</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/13/ps3-hdd/#comment-1249</guid>
					<description>"The competition is not requiring one but needs one as a standard?"  

That comment has 2 positions related in such a way that it is impossible 4 both to b true. iWish ppl would stop talking about the X360 in a feeble attempt to find fault w/ it when they r clearly bustling w/ ignorance. There r no games out now that require the HD - that could change - and if there isn't a broadband connection, Xbox Live is mute. Those two simple facts alone r evident enough that having a HD on the X360 is not required. For indiduals under these circumstances, a memory card will serve just fine as it has in the past generations.

iHave a HD &#38; a memory card 4 my X360. iUse the memory card as my default  save locations 4 games 'cuz I'm usually on the go and like to take my save data &#38; games w/ me when iPlan on visiting a fellow X360 owner along the way. The ONLY time iUse the HD is 4 Live downloads; if it wasn't for that iWouldn't need it. Bottom line, the HD is not necessary unless u plan to use specific functions which r not essential to the primary gaming functions of the system. 

As far as Sony releasing the HD w/ their system, iWIl b surprised if they do. iDon't know what the price of the PS3 will b, but the price of just the blue-ray, bluetooth, GB lan, &#38; dual HDMI tech certainly must b pushing the price of this thing into dangerous territory. The exclusion of the HD from the PS3 will b 1 of the easiest way to cut costs to keep the price within reasonable limits. Even w/ all the tech &#38; promises Sony is pushing 4 the PS3, general consumers will still regard the product as a game system &#38; its conceivalbe that most will not pay top dollor to get 1. Sony has to keep their price low especially considering the gambles their taking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The competition is not requiring one but needs one as a standard?&#8221;  </p>
<p>That comment has 2 positions related in such a way that it is impossible 4 both to b true. iWish ppl would stop talking about the X360 in a feeble attempt to find fault w/ it when they r clearly bustling w/ ignorance. There r no games out now that require the HD - that could change - and if there isn&#8217;t a broadband connection, Xbox Live is mute. Those two simple facts alone r evident enough that having a HD on the X360 is not required. For indiduals under these circumstances, a memory card will serve just fine as it has in the past generations.</p>
<p>iHave a HD &amp; a memory card 4 my X360. iUse the memory card as my default  save locations 4 games &#8216;cuz I&#8217;m usually on the go and like to take my save data &amp; games w/ me when iPlan on visiting a fellow X360 owner along the way. The ONLY time iUse the HD is 4 Live downloads; if it wasn&#8217;t for that iWouldn&#8217;t need it. Bottom line, the HD is not necessary unless u plan to use specific functions which r not essential to the primary gaming functions of the system. </p>
<p>As far as Sony releasing the HD w/ their system, iWIl b surprised if they do. iDon&#8217;t know what the price of the PS3 will b, but the price of just the blue-ray, bluetooth, GB lan, &amp; dual HDMI tech certainly must b pushing the price of this thing into dangerous territory. The exclusion of the HD from the PS3 will b 1 of the easiest way to cut costs to keep the price within reasonable limits. Even w/ all the tech &amp; promises Sony is pushing 4 the PS3, general consumers will still regard the product as a game system &amp; its conceivalbe that most will not pay top dollor to get 1. Sony has to keep their price low especially considering the gambles their taking.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/13/ps3-hdd/#comment-1247</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/13/ps3-hdd/#comment-1247</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I'm more worried about the read speed of the BD drive than I am about an included HDD. Ideally I'll take both a 4x BD drive AND an HDD, but who knows what Sony will decide?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m more worried about the read speed of the BD drive than I am about an included HDD. Ideally I&#8217;ll take both a 4x BD drive AND an HDD, but who knows what Sony will decide?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: emanuel</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/13/ps3-hdd/#comment-1246</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ps3blog.net/2006/02/13/ps3-hdd/#comment-1246</guid>
					<description>Yeah their competition isn't requiring one, but needs one as a standard. Lets hope sony includes one, because the ways it's looking a 4x blu-ray drive will cost more than a 1x drive and the read speed isn't all that great i heard. But who knows, i'm pretty sure Sony will make a bug free machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah their competition isn&#8217;t requiring one, but needs one as a standard. Lets hope sony includes one, because the ways it&#8217;s looking a 4x blu-ray drive will cost more than a 1x drive and the read speed isn&#8217;t all that great i heard. But who knows, i&#8217;m pretty sure Sony will make a bug free machine.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
