<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bioshock Non-Exclusivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sporty</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154875</link>
		<dc:creator>Sporty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154875</guid>
		<description>Probably right about that. I would imagine MS wouldn&#039;t have put a &quot;Only On 360&quot; on the cover if they knew a PS3 version was in the works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably right about that. I would imagine MS wouldn&#8217;t have put a &#8220;Only On 360&#8243; on the cover if they knew a PS3 version was in the works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154874</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154874</guid>
		<description>Did he lie?  If he knew the PS3 version was coming or even possible, then he was lying, flat out.

However, it is possible at that point the PS3 version had not even been considered.  

Let&#039;s not condemn the man as a liar without knowing all the facts first!  As it is, we know not either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did he lie?  If he knew the PS3 version was coming or even possible, then he was lying, flat out.</p>
<p>However, it is possible at that point the PS3 version had not even been considered.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not condemn the man as a liar without knowing all the facts first!  As it is, we know not either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sporty</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154873</link>
		<dc:creator>Sporty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154873</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll probably buy it.

But I agree with Segitz. I think Virtua Fighter 5 and to a lesser extent UTIII cannibalized their own sales by announcing a port way too soon. Any potential buyers that were looking at the system for these games specifically knew they could wait for a probably better more polished version. By the time the games hit the other consoles hype and interest waned.

Bioshock on PS3 will probably do decent, nothing stellar but one advantage of the year wait was UE3 isn&#039;t crippled on PS3 anymore since UT3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll probably buy it.</p>
<p>But I agree with Segitz. I think Virtua Fighter 5 and to a lesser extent UTIII cannibalized their own sales by announcing a port way too soon. Any potential buyers that were looking at the system for these games specifically knew they could wait for a probably better more polished version. By the time the games hit the other consoles hype and interest waned.</p>
<p>Bioshock on PS3 will probably do decent, nothing stellar but one advantage of the year wait was UE3 isn&#8217;t crippled on PS3 anymore since UT3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154861</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154861</guid>
		<description>Nice positive outlook you have there Emrah. :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice positive outlook you have there Emrah. <img src='http://www.ps3blog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pc</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154855</link>
		<dc:creator>Pc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/06/29/bioshock-non-exclusivity/#comment-154855</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually excited about BS coming to the PS3 ! I just hope they don&#039;t try and charge 59.99 for a game thats been out for soooo long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually excited about BS coming to the PS3 ! I just hope they don&#8217;t try and charge 59.99 for a game thats been out for soooo long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
