<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Killzone 2 Objections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:19:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Con</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-158481</link>
		<dc:creator>Con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-158481</guid>
		<description>I personally love Revolvers, but it is pretty dumb i guess.

The green sight can be pretty practical if it&#039;s a dark area.

I usually reload the same amount as this guy on shooters, which can be a strength and a weakness.

I am not bothered about the last one if they&#039;re all good, but if most of them are crap then it would be a serious problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally love Revolvers, but it is pretty dumb i guess.</p>
<p>The green sight can be pretty practical if it&#8217;s a dark area.</p>
<p>I usually reload the same amount as this guy on shooters, which can be a strength and a weakness.</p>
<p>I am not bothered about the last one if they&#8217;re all good, but if most of them are crap then it would be a serious problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trieloth</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157910</link>
		<dc:creator>Trieloth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157910</guid>
		<description>dang man what the hell? you didnt mention split screen.
MGO didnt have that many maps at first and people still bought it...Meh iam done trying to defend &#039;Video Games&#039; for now. Iam get&#039;n to old for this nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dang man what the hell? you didnt mention split screen.<br />
MGO didnt have that many maps at first and people still bought it&#8230;Meh iam done trying to defend &#8216;Video Games&#8217; for now. Iam get&#8217;n to old for this nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157905</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157905</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say I love the look of the sight, I wouldn&#039;t want them to change that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say I love the look of the sight, I wouldn&#8217;t want them to change that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157882</link>
		<dc:creator>Henning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157882</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re getting at. If it was an Xbox 360 exclusive I wouldn&#039;t be concerned about the revolver? Or the lack of maps?

In fact, I wouldn&#039;t be concerned about anything, because I don&#039;t have a 360.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re getting at. If it was an Xbox 360 exclusive I wouldn&#8217;t be concerned about the revolver? Or the lack of maps?</p>
<p>In fact, I wouldn&#8217;t be concerned about anything, because I don&#8217;t have a 360.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alisound</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157881</link>
		<dc:creator>alisound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157881</guid>
		<description>if you guys were to imagine for a second that this was an xbox 360 exclusive, what would you really think about it . and be honest,  i dont just want to hear about the graphics, and the reload animations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you guys were to imagine for a second that this was an xbox 360 exclusive, what would you really think about it . and be honest,  i dont just want to hear about the graphics, and the reload animations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henning</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157873</link>
		<dc:creator>Henning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157873</guid>
		<description>1) I have no problem with variety. But when the variety is amongst weapons from the 1960&#039;s in a futuristic game? Come on. I don&#039;t mind bullets, but at least package them right.

2) No it&#039;s not. We&#039;ll be using the sight ALL THE TIME. It&#039;s gonna wear thin really fast.

3) Yeah - read my disclaimer.

4) But the maps YOU like and the maps someone else may like are two totally different things. I don&#039;t like Vacant, for example. You have to get some good variety in there so that there&#039;s something for everyone. I know that points one to three are nitpicking, and if they aren&#039;t fixed, oh well, what can I do. But I&#039;m sticking to my guns on this one. Eight maps just isn&#039;t enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I have no problem with variety. But when the variety is amongst weapons from the 1960&#8242;s in a futuristic game? Come on. I don&#8217;t mind bullets, but at least package them right.</p>
<p>2) No it&#8217;s not. We&#8217;ll be using the sight ALL THE TIME. It&#8217;s gonna wear thin really fast.</p>
<p>3) Yeah &#8211; read my disclaimer.</p>
<p>4) But the maps YOU like and the maps someone else may like are two totally different things. I don&#8217;t like Vacant, for example. You have to get some good variety in there so that there&#8217;s something for everyone. I know that points one to three are nitpicking, and if they aren&#8217;t fixed, oh well, what can I do. But I&#8217;m sticking to my guns on this one. Eight maps just isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PSN: Lifendz</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157872</link>
		<dc:creator>PSN: Lifendz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157872</guid>
		<description>I have no prob with the revolver at all. Shows weapon variety. A Magnum six shooter might be the most powerful firearm in the game if you get upclose to an enemy. 

2. The sight? C&#039;mon Henning. That&#039;s nitpicking to the highest degree. 

3. You made the reloading sound like the guy took 4 shots and then reloaded. The reloading was just normal. And I reload after I kill an enemy anyway so it doesn&#039;t matter to me. 

4. Eight maps is plenty if done right. I probably only enjoy 6 maps in COD4. Vacant, Ambush, Cross fire, broadcast, Crash, and one more whose name I can&#039;t remember. And I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll have map packs for the game. Probably more than COD4 because Activision is all about pumping out a new product every year. 


The fact that your complaints were limited to just the above says how good the game really is. Can&#039;t wait to serve some pwnage on ya when the game comes out ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no prob with the revolver at all. Shows weapon variety. A Magnum six shooter might be the most powerful firearm in the game if you get upclose to an enemy. </p>
<p>2. The sight? C&#8217;mon Henning. That&#8217;s nitpicking to the highest degree. </p>
<p>3. You made the reloading sound like the guy took 4 shots and then reloaded. The reloading was just normal. And I reload after I kill an enemy anyway so it doesn&#8217;t matter to me. </p>
<p>4. Eight maps is plenty if done right. I probably only enjoy 6 maps in COD4. Vacant, Ambush, Cross fire, broadcast, Crash, and one more whose name I can&#8217;t remember. And I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll have map packs for the game. Probably more than COD4 because Activision is all about pumping out a new product every year. </p>
<p>The fact that your complaints were limited to just the above says how good the game really is. Can&#8217;t wait to serve some pwnage on ya when the game comes out <img src='http://www.ps3blog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ehandlr</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157840</link>
		<dc:creator>ehandlr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/24/killzone-2-objections/#comment-157840</guid>
		<description>1.  Even with technology, revolvers generally allow for higher caliber shells and an overall heavier gun for accuracy.

2.  I like the green site.  The dot looks ever smaller then COD&#039;4s.  I&#039;d like to actually play it before I call COD4&#039;s better.

3.  Guerilla wanted to showcase reloading in the recent demos/trailers.  I&#039;m not sure if you seen all the reload gifs...but they are extremely lifelike.  Especially the shoulder rocket.  Freaking amazing animation.

4.  8 maps on a game that we didn&#039;t expect much from the multiplayer in the first place is fine by me.  The single player game is simply amazing from what I saw.  They are almost 100% definately adding more.

One thing we need to try to get away from..including myself is comparing every FPS to COD4.  I know it sounds like I&#039;m saying we should lower our standards for every other game....but the fact remains if you do the comparison...you will leave disappointed most of the time.

I however think this game has the potential to outdo COD4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Even with technology, revolvers generally allow for higher caliber shells and an overall heavier gun for accuracy.</p>
<p>2.  I like the green site.  The dot looks ever smaller then COD&#8217;4s.  I&#8217;d like to actually play it before I call COD4&#8242;s better.</p>
<p>3.  Guerilla wanted to showcase reloading in the recent demos/trailers.  I&#8217;m not sure if you seen all the reload gifs&#8230;but they are extremely lifelike.  Especially the shoulder rocket.  Freaking amazing animation.</p>
<p>4.  8 maps on a game that we didn&#8217;t expect much from the multiplayer in the first place is fine by me.  The single player game is simply amazing from what I saw.  They are almost 100% definately adding more.</p>
<p>One thing we need to try to get away from..including myself is comparing every FPS to COD4.  I know it sounds like I&#8217;m saying we should lower our standards for every other game&#8230;.but the fact remains if you do the comparison&#8230;you will leave disappointed most of the time.</p>
<p>I however think this game has the potential to outdo COD4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

