<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What The? PS3 Earns More for EA than 360</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158969</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158969</guid>
		<description>I think people are overlooking another possible cause. Piracy!

I know its not the only cause but if you don&#039;t buy the game the makers don&#039;t get money.

Is it a coincidence the PS3 has not been hacked and earns EA 70M more in 3 months than the 360.

Maybe creators can look at these figures and start focusing on using the PS3s potential instead of giving us cut down versions of games to make porting easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people are overlooking another possible cause. Piracy!</p>
<p>I know its not the only cause but if you don&#8217;t buy the game the makers don&#8217;t get money.</p>
<p>Is it a coincidence the PS3 has not been hacked and earns EA 70M more in 3 months than the 360.</p>
<p>Maybe creators can look at these figures and start focusing on using the PS3s potential instead of giving us cut down versions of games to make porting easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158699</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158699</guid>
		<description>I think the reason the 360 is the main platform is they are also creating a game for the PC.  Combined EA makes more money from PC/360 than they do on PS3.  

I think the reason has been stated.  The dollar blows and Euro and Pound are much stronger.  PS3 is much stronger in Europe.  I am curious to see how the next few months go because the American sports are coming out (Madden, NCAA football, NHL, NBA Live, Tiger Woods, etc.  

Ideally EA would just treat each console as seperate systems and develop them accordingly.  Don&#039;t buy crappy ports from any developer.  Vote with your hard earned $.  Let them know that a half-assed effort will get no support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason the 360 is the main platform is they are also creating a game for the PC.  Combined EA makes more money from PC/360 than they do on PS3.  </p>
<p>I think the reason has been stated.  The dollar blows and Euro and Pound are much stronger.  PS3 is much stronger in Europe.  I am curious to see how the next few months go because the American sports are coming out (Madden, NCAA football, NHL, NBA Live, Tiger Woods, etc.  </p>
<p>Ideally EA would just treat each console as seperate systems and develop them accordingly.  Don&#8217;t buy crappy ports from any developer.  Vote with your hard earned $.  Let them know that a half-assed effort will get no support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158585</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158585</guid>
		<description>maybe its news like this that will help the PS3. EA is a huge multi-platform publisher, and if they&#039;re making more money off of software sales for the PS3 than 360, maybe other third party developers will have more faith in the PS3, granting more exclusives, etc. 2008 is going to be PS3&#039;s biggest year yet. Microsoft has probably been shitting themselves, with, really, the only recent good news in software for them was FFXIII going multiplatform, well, news that stood out anyway (I own both systems, but haven&#039;t touched my 360 for a couple months, but use my PS3 everyday).

As far as ports go, they&#039;re getting better wuality, with most even being on par with the 360 counterpart. The best advantage would be to develop on the PS3 then port to 360, taking advantage of each system&#039;s strong points. Focusing on the 360 first only weakened the PS3 ports because of vastly different system functions, and since the 360 is statistically easier to program for, focusing on the PS3&#039;s version and then porting it to the easier to develop 360 would either make both games on par or the PS3&#039;s looking better and playing better. Look at Burnout: Paradise and Battlefield: Bad Company, they&#039;re pretty much equal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe its news like this that will help the PS3. EA is a huge multi-platform publisher, and if they&#8217;re making more money off of software sales for the PS3 than 360, maybe other third party developers will have more faith in the PS3, granting more exclusives, etc. 2008 is going to be PS3&#8242;s biggest year yet. Microsoft has probably been shitting themselves, with, really, the only recent good news in software for them was FFXIII going multiplatform, well, news that stood out anyway (I own both systems, but haven&#8217;t touched my 360 for a couple months, but use my PS3 everyday).</p>
<p>As far as ports go, they&#8217;re getting better wuality, with most even being on par with the 360 counterpart. The best advantage would be to develop on the PS3 then port to 360, taking advantage of each system&#8217;s strong points. Focusing on the 360 first only weakened the PS3 ports because of vastly different system functions, and since the 360 is statistically easier to program for, focusing on the PS3&#8242;s version and then porting it to the easier to develop 360 would either make both games on par or the PS3&#8242;s looking better and playing better. Look at Burnout: Paradise and Battlefield: Bad Company, they&#8217;re pretty much equal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sporty</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158581</link>
		<dc:creator>Sporty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158581</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s all down to what John said, Weak US dollar and strong EU sales. FIFA doesn&#039;t hurt.

Also from the Gamasutra article, PSN has lower loyalties so Rock band etc get to keep a larger portion of the sales, although I&#039;m sure 360 has a higher volume there. And 360 has a larger back library so more competition there.

What does surprise me is the PSP sales. You never see PSP titles making a splash in the charts regardless of the hardware sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s all down to what John said, Weak US dollar and strong EU sales. FIFA doesn&#8217;t hurt.</p>
<p>Also from the Gamasutra article, PSN has lower loyalties so Rock band etc get to keep a larger portion of the sales, although I&#8217;m sure 360 has a higher volume there. And 360 has a larger back library so more competition there.</p>
<p>What does surprise me is the PSP sales. You never see PSP titles making a splash in the charts regardless of the hardware sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rui</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158577</link>
		<dc:creator>Rui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158577</guid>
		<description>2 words (for me)

Europe + Fifa08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 words (for me)</p>
<p>Europe + Fifa08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fleakitten</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158571</link>
		<dc:creator>fleakitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158571</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this is just EA or are all other 3rd party publishers in the same situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this is just EA or are all other 3rd party publishers in the same situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158567</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158567</guid>
		<description>Actually only $59.99 here (other than collector&#039;s editions) and a lot of games don&#039;t even stay that high for too long.  Devil May Cry 4 is already $39.99 most places.  Retailers just don&#039;t have the shelf space to keep everything available forever.  Publishers are kind of screwing themselves in this way - they pump so much out that nothing can retain its value for very long.  The is one thing Nintendo does better.  Twilight Princess is still full price everywhere because there haven&#039;t been another two installments released since it came out.  The &quot;get a new version out every year&quot; mentality of third parties is backfiring in some respects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually only $59.99 here (other than collector&#8217;s editions) and a lot of games don&#8217;t even stay that high for too long.  Devil May Cry 4 is already $39.99 most places.  Retailers just don&#8217;t have the shelf space to keep everything available forever.  Publishers are kind of screwing themselves in this way &#8211; they pump so much out that nothing can retain its value for very long.  The is one thing Nintendo does better.  Twilight Princess is still full price everywhere because there haven&#8217;t been another two installments released since it came out.  The &#8220;get a new version out every year&#8221; mentality of third parties is backfiring in some respects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158566</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/2008/07/30/what-the-ps3-earns-more-for-ea-than-360/#comment-158566</guid>
		<description>Europe and low dollar value.

EA is better off selling 10 games at 70€ a pop rather than 20 at $70 a pop, simply because the fixed costs means the margin on the euro side is much higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Europe and low dollar value.</p>
<p>EA is better off selling 10 games at 70€ a pop rather than 20 at $70 a pop, simply because the fixed costs means the margin on the euro side is much higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

