<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Cloud Computing Gaming is Going to Happen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/03/30/why-cloud-computing-gaming-is-going-to-happen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/03/30/why-cloud-computing-gaming-is-going-to-happen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrin</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/03/30/why-cloud-computing-gaming-is-going-to-happen/#comment-199679</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=6015#comment-199679</guid>
		<description>OK, so latency is an issue today. During a latency bump in today&#039;s Internet games, the game will continue to control and render smoothly (all done locally), but will fall out of sync with the server and will jarringly resynch when network connection is resumed.
With server-side game rendering, the multiplayer sync problems wouldn&#039;t be any worse than they are today, but latency problems would also affect the player&#039;s own character control (since player input is processed remotely rather than locally).

George, I agree, that you can probably build hardware setups that scales better than linearly. But even in that worst-case scenario, that wouldn&#039;t be a deal breaker so that&#039;s not worth debating</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so latency is an issue today. During a latency bump in today&#8217;s Internet games, the game will continue to control and render smoothly (all done locally), but will fall out of sync with the server and will jarringly resynch when network connection is resumed.<br />
With server-side game rendering, the multiplayer sync problems wouldn&#8217;t be any worse than they are today, but latency problems would also affect the player&#8217;s own character control (since player input is processed remotely rather than locally).</p>
<p>George, I agree, that you can probably build hardware setups that scales better than linearly. But even in that worst-case scenario, that wouldn&#8217;t be a deal breaker so that&#8217;s not worth debating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/03/30/why-cloud-computing-gaming-is-going-to-happen/#comment-199657</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=6015#comment-199657</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy this: &quot;Hardware requirements scale linearly with the number of concurrent users.&quot;

I&#039;ve been able to do that where I work, and you get more than twice the amount of users if you double the hardware.  For example we recently doubled server capabilites and are now hosting about 6000 users on one machine; previously we were only able to host 2000 users on hardware half as good.

I think it&#039;s more like car engines, the total horsepower is far greater than the sum of the parts.

8 core CPUs will be mainstream very soon, I expect that we will see smaller, cheaper &quot;mini-clouds&quot; not too far away.  You can all ready get 4 motherboard rack mount clusters (4, 2 processor boards in a 2U chassis).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy this: &#8220;Hardware requirements scale linearly with the number of concurrent users.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been able to do that where I work, and you get more than twice the amount of users if you double the hardware.  For example we recently doubled server capabilites and are now hosting about 6000 users on one machine; previously we were only able to host 2000 users on hardware half as good.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s more like car engines, the total horsepower is far greater than the sum of the parts.</p>
<p>8 core CPUs will be mainstream very soon, I expect that we will see smaller, cheaper &#8220;mini-clouds&#8221; not too far away.  You can all ready get 4 motherboard rack mount clusters (4, 2 processor boards in a 2U chassis).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yodaddy</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/03/30/why-cloud-computing-gaming-is-going-to-happen/#comment-199584</link>
		<dc:creator>yodaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=6015#comment-199584</guid>
		<description>I got 15megs down and 1 up... does that count for anything ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got 15megs down and 1 up&#8230; does that count for anything ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P5ycH0</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/03/30/why-cloud-computing-gaming-is-going-to-happen/#comment-199561</link>
		<dc:creator>P5ycH0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=6015#comment-199561</guid>
		<description>I like the idea. Not for the games, but for the improvements ISP&#039;s need to make in order to coop with this. They were slacking the last couple of years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea. Not for the games, but for the improvements ISP&#8217;s need to make in order to coop with this. They were slacking the last couple of years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emrah</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/03/30/why-cloud-computing-gaming-is-going-to-happen/#comment-199407</link>
		<dc:creator>Emrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=6015#comment-199407</guid>
		<description>@john: I agree, but if they could make come up with a sufficient response time for all players involved to be almost as responsive as local play, which is what they claim, multiplayer would be piece of cake as the game would be hosted at the same place as the video servers.

It is just that their claim is not achievable on today&#039;s infrastructure. A tenth second of latency is VERY frustrating to any player, since your game state will also have to be updated a tenth second later, unlike current games which predicts the current state on the client side)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@john: I agree, but if they could make come up with a sufficient response time for all players involved to be almost as responsive as local play, which is what they claim, multiplayer would be piece of cake as the game would be hosted at the same place as the video servers.</p>
<p>It is just that their claim is not achievable on today&#8217;s infrastructure. A tenth second of latency is VERY frustrating to any player, since your game state will also have to be updated a tenth second later, unlike current games which predicts the current state on the client side)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
