<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No more 60FPS games from Insomniac.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/10/30/no-more-60fps-games-from-insomniac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/10/30/no-more-60fps-games-from-insomniac/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iLLersz1</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/10/30/no-more-60fps-games-from-insomniac/#comment-237538</link>
		<dc:creator>iLLersz1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=14750#comment-237538</guid>
		<description>((...the sacrifice in frame rate to make a game look better))

How is this possible !?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>((&#8230;the sacrifice in frame rate to make a game look better))</p>
<p>How is this possible !?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legion213</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/10/30/no-more-60fps-games-from-insomniac/#comment-237218</link>
		<dc:creator>Legion213</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=14750#comment-237218</guid>
		<description>If i had a choice between 30fps and a crisp looking game.  Or, 60fps with a fuzzy almost out of focus looking game.  I would pick the 30fps every time.  

I played the Rachet and Clank demo and if that is running at 60fps then I am sorry but the fuzzy visuals was a bad trade.  If you can find a happy medium then great.  But make the game look its best first.  Then worry about the FPS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i had a choice between 30fps and a crisp looking game.  Or, 60fps with a fuzzy almost out of focus looking game.  I would pick the 30fps every time.  </p>
<p>I played the Rachet and Clank demo and if that is running at 60fps then I am sorry but the fuzzy visuals was a bad trade.  If you can find a happy medium then great.  But make the game look its best first.  Then worry about the FPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emrah</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/10/30/no-more-60fps-games-from-insomniac/#comment-237181</link>
		<dc:creator>Emrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=14750#comment-237181</guid>
		<description>Btw, people do not realize making a game run at 60fps adds to its appeal, even if some/most can&#039;t fully understand of put a finger on it. I applaud Nintendo&#039;s commitment to 60fps gaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, people do not realize making a game run at 60fps adds to its appeal, even if some/most can&#8217;t fully understand of put a finger on it. I applaud Nintendo&#8217;s commitment to 60fps gaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emrah</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/10/30/no-more-60fps-games-from-insomniac/#comment-237175</link>
		<dc:creator>Emrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=14750#comment-237175</guid>
		<description>I prefer 60 fps smoothness over extra polygons most time of the day. I can differentiate between 30 and 60 fps very easily. So this is sad news for me. I want to do a side by side comparison of 30 and 60 fps in a 60 fps video to be viewed on 60hz monitor someday, and people who don&#039;t get it will realize they get it.

One reason COD looks so awesome in motion is because it runs at 60fps. It simply rewards your eyes with more motion information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer 60 fps smoothness over extra polygons most time of the day. I can differentiate between 30 and 60 fps very easily. So this is sad news for me. I want to do a side by side comparison of 30 and 60 fps in a 60 fps video to be viewed on 60hz monitor someday, and people who don&#8217;t get it will realize they get it.</p>
<p>One reason COD looks so awesome in motion is because it runs at 60fps. It simply rewards your eyes with more motion information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceidz</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/10/30/no-more-60fps-games-from-insomniac/#comment-237168</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceidz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=14750#comment-237168</guid>
		<description>I do not totally agree with you Paranoimia. 24 fps is the lower bound that the eye can see without seeing choppiness. The human eye does see a difference between 30 and 60fps.
When I first played Ratchet &amp; Clank, I DID notice the 60fps ! It&#039;s so much smoother than other games !
Of course, I do agree with you too about the rock-solid 30fps with higher detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not totally agree with you Paranoimia. 24 fps is the lower bound that the eye can see without seeing choppiness. The human eye does see a difference between 30 and 60fps.<br />
When I first played Ratchet &amp; Clank, I DID notice the 60fps ! It&#8217;s so much smoother than other games !<br />
Of course, I do agree with you too about the rock-solid 30fps with higher detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
