<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is GTA Annualized?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/12/04/is-gta-annualized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/12/04/is-gta-annualized/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmyMagnum</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/12/04/is-gta-annualized/#comment-238493</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyMagnum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=16027#comment-238493</guid>
		<description>but they didn&#039;t come from the same team.

going by that analogy (open mission structure, etc.), then there are a lot of open sandbox titles with similar traits (Jak 2,3, etc)

And yes, I&#039;ve played Bully, but it was different enough to feel like something other than GTA, it just had things in common with it, as do a lot of other games that used the same basic formula that GTA3 created.

They did have a same writer in Dan Houser, though (but they had different co-writers), so that would help explain the writing style, but they had completely different teams working on the games themselves, Bully just borrowed heavily from the GTA formula. And Dan Houser is VP of Creativity in Rockstar Games, so he has the ability to work with any of the other teams anyway, he doesn&#039;t work for Rockstar North</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but they didn&#8217;t come from the same team.</p>
<p>going by that analogy (open mission structure, etc.), then there are a lot of open sandbox titles with similar traits (Jak 2,3, etc)</p>
<p>And yes, I&#8217;ve played Bully, but it was different enough to feel like something other than GTA, it just had things in common with it, as do a lot of other games that used the same basic formula that GTA3 created.</p>
<p>They did have a same writer in Dan Houser, though (but they had different co-writers), so that would help explain the writing style, but they had completely different teams working on the games themselves, Bully just borrowed heavily from the GTA formula. And Dan Houser is VP of Creativity in Rockstar Games, so he has the ability to work with any of the other teams anyway, he doesn&#8217;t work for Rockstar North</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrin</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/12/04/is-gta-annualized/#comment-238490</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=16027#comment-238490</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bully and Red Dead Redemption, apart from maybe a few writers and using the same game engines and whatnot, really have nothing to do with GTA&quot;

Did you play Bully?

The whole game was structured very similarly to GTA. You have a map compass with missions to go and start. You had vehicles, home bases, mini games, and easter eggs.

Plus all of the writing, character dialog and cut scenes just felt like they came from the same team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bully and Red Dead Redemption, apart from maybe a few writers and using the same game engines and whatnot, really have nothing to do with GTA&#8221;</p>
<p>Did you play Bully?</p>
<p>The whole game was structured very similarly to GTA. You have a map compass with missions to go and start. You had vehicles, home bases, mini games, and easter eggs.</p>
<p>Plus all of the writing, character dialog and cut scenes just felt like they came from the same team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmyMagnum</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/12/04/is-gta-annualized/#comment-238484</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyMagnum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=16027#comment-238484</guid>
		<description>but they&#039;re still their own entities. Lots of companies share code and people with one another, but they&#039;re still a separate studio, so, therefore, games like Bully and Red Dead Redemption, apart from maybe a few writers and using the same game engines and whatnot, really have nothing to do with GTA apart from that (and, obviously, they use the same engines because its cost effective).

As far as LCS and VCS go, they used most of the assets were already available in GTA3 and VC, but the actual games themselves were subpar compared to R*N productions. Sure, the GTA team at R*N would help them, but Leeds still had most of the creative freedom

Also, given the length of the games, they&#039;re about half the length of console games, so going by that, you could technically count LCS and VCS as one full game. Neither of which, though, were as fun as R*N&#039;s GTAs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but they&#8217;re still their own entities. Lots of companies share code and people with one another, but they&#8217;re still a separate studio, so, therefore, games like Bully and Red Dead Redemption, apart from maybe a few writers and using the same game engines and whatnot, really have nothing to do with GTA apart from that (and, obviously, they use the same engines because its cost effective).</p>
<p>As far as LCS and VCS go, they used most of the assets were already available in GTA3 and VC, but the actual games themselves were subpar compared to R*N productions. Sure, the GTA team at R*N would help them, but Leeds still had most of the creative freedom</p>
<p>Also, given the length of the games, they&#8217;re about half the length of console games, so going by that, you could technically count LCS and VCS as one full game. Neither of which, though, were as fun as R*N&#8217;s GTAs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrin</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/12/04/is-gta-annualized/#comment-238483</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=16027#comment-238483</guid>
		<description>Before, with Rockstar the publisher, Rockstar North was the gifted studio, and their other studios put out junk like State of Emergency or mediocre stuff like Smuggler&#039;s Run.

Today, I think they cross polinate their teams much more, and the lines between dev teams are more blurred. Bully lists Rockstar Vancouver as the main studio, but clearly they used the GTA engine, GTA writers, lots of high level creative directors (Dan Houser), and had technical assistance from the GTA team.

Good analogy with Final Fantasy. Sure, all those Final Fantasy offshoot games don&#039;t &quot;really&quot; count as a big FF title. But if Square was using the same engine to make a similar type of big full release game, with shared dev talent, I think that would count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before, with Rockstar the publisher, Rockstar North was the gifted studio, and their other studios put out junk like State of Emergency or mediocre stuff like Smuggler&#8217;s Run.</p>
<p>Today, I think they cross polinate their teams much more, and the lines between dev teams are more blurred. Bully lists Rockstar Vancouver as the main studio, but clearly they used the GTA engine, GTA writers, lots of high level creative directors (Dan Houser), and had technical assistance from the GTA team.</p>
<p>Good analogy with Final Fantasy. Sure, all those Final Fantasy offshoot games don&#8217;t &#8220;really&#8221; count as a big FF title. But if Square was using the same engine to make a similar type of big full release game, with shared dev talent, I think that would count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2009/12/04/is-gta-annualized/#comment-238481</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=16027#comment-238481</guid>
		<description>It was three and a half years between main installments from Rockstar North, so no, this series isn&#039;t even close to being annualized.  If you counted spinoffs and whatnot, Final Fantasy would be a monthly franchise despite waiting three and a half years between XII and XIII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was three and a half years between main installments from Rockstar North, so no, this series isn&#8217;t even close to being annualized.  If you counted spinoffs and whatnot, Final Fantasy would be a monthly franchise despite waiting three and a half years between XII and XIII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
