<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BioShock 2: Q&amp;A Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/02/08/bioshock-2-qa-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/02/08/bioshock-2-qa-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealMaxPower</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/02/08/bioshock-2-qa-part-2/#comment-241325</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealMaxPower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=17825#comment-241325</guid>
		<description>You should really play the original.  I too will not be getting this game, but more from the standpoint that the first one was perfect.  It wasn&#039;t designed to be more than the one game.  They haven&#039;t made enough changes for me to want to go back to Rapture again.    

Rapture was a great playground with a good story.  It had its flaws but overall it was one of the best games I had played in a long time.  Reviews make it seem like more of the same for part 2, which might be great, but the charm of the first is gone.

Might seem like strange logic (if any at all), but My I don&#039;t want to ruin my experience in Rapture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should really play the original.  I too will not be getting this game, but more from the standpoint that the first one was perfect.  It wasn&#8217;t designed to be more than the one game.  They haven&#8217;t made enough changes for me to want to go back to Rapture again.    </p>
<p>Rapture was a great playground with a good story.  It had its flaws but overall it was one of the best games I had played in a long time.  Reviews make it seem like more of the same for part 2, which might be great, but the charm of the first is gone.</p>
<p>Might seem like strange logic (if any at all), but My I don&#8217;t want to ruin my experience in Rapture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lordincubus</title>
		<link>http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/02/08/bioshock-2-qa-part-2/#comment-241308</link>
		<dc:creator>lordincubus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=17825#comment-241308</guid>
		<description>I am sorry but I am really not planning on getting this game.  I am so over shooters and really only need God of war and Heavy rain to come out.  Can anyone tell me why this game would even be worth getting.  (mind you I never played the original)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry but I am really not planning on getting this game.  I am so over shooters and really only need God of war and Heavy rain to come out.  Can anyone tell me why this game would even be worth getting.  (mind you I never played the original)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

