Comments on: PS3 Private Keys Discovered (Homebrew/Piracy) ***Update..Master Keys Found for PS3 and PSP http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/12/30/ps3-private-keys-discovered-homebrewpiracy/ Sun, 19 May 2013 02:53:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: premiersoupir http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/12/30/ps3-private-keys-discovered-homebrewpiracy/#comment-302097 premiersoupir Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:00:53 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=33990#comment-302097 <blockquote cite="comment-302096"> <strong><a href="#comment-302096" rel="nofollow">Eddie</a></strong>: No real evidence I myself can supply but images of motherboards. </blockquote> Huh, cool -- and you're right: That's mighty convincing! Thanks for sharing these, Eddie!

Eddie:
No real evidence I myself can supply but images of motherboards.

Huh, cool — and you’re right: That’s mighty convincing! Thanks for sharing these, Eddie!

]]> By: Eddie http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/12/30/ps3-private-keys-discovered-homebrewpiracy/#comment-302096 Eddie Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:46:36 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=33990#comment-302096 <blockquote cite="comment-302081"> <strong><a href="#comment-302081" rel="nofollow">premiersoupir</a></strong>: <p sizcache="4" sizset="303">I am curious about this. GeoHot claimed ten months ago that the chipset stuff is a lie, and that Sony had just flipped a software switch to disable ps2 emulation. Does anyone have any good (non-Sony, non-GeoHot) resources that verify the true situation?  <br /><a class=comment_quote_link onmousedown="quote('302081', 'premiersoupir', 'comment','div-comment-302081', false, false); try { addComment.moveForm('div-comment-302081', '302081', 'respond', '33990'); } catch(e) {}; return false;" title="Click here or select text to quote comment" href="javascript:void(null)" rel="nofollow"><br />^</a></p><p></p> </blockquote> No real evidence I myself can supply but images of motherboards. 60 gig with very visablle EE+GS http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2006/1111/ps3_32.jpg 40 gig with no BC whatsoever http://static.flickr.com/2027/1802652525_aa0c26b42a.jpg 80 gig with GS + eDram http://static.flickr.com/171/463096553_5d0d336b3f.jpg I'm guessing you can't really lie about visible hardware.

premiersoupir:

I am curious about this. GeoHot claimed ten months ago that the chipset stuff is a lie, and that Sony had just flipped a software switch to disable ps2 emulation. Does anyone have any good (non-Sony, non-GeoHot) resources that verify the true situation?  

^

No real evidence I myself can supply but images of motherboards.

60 gig with very visablle EE+GS
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2006/1111/ps3_32.jpg

40 gig with no BC whatsoever
http://static.flickr.com/2027/1802652525_aa0c26b42a.jpg

80 gig with GS + eDram
http://static.flickr.com/171/463096553_5d0d336b3f.jpg

I’m guessing you can’t really lie about visible hardware.

]]> By: premiersoupir http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/12/30/ps3-private-keys-discovered-homebrewpiracy/#comment-302081 premiersoupir Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:09:35 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=33990#comment-302081 <blockquote cite="comment-302080"> <strong><a href="#comment-302080" rel="nofollow">Eddie</a></strong>: No it wasn’t 100% emulted.Only the EE chipset was missing, not the GS chipset.The 80 gig had 1/2 of the hardware needed to be fully BC without any emulation at all.The slims don’t have either chipset at all.   </blockquote> I am curious about this. GeoHot claimed ten months ago that the chipset stuff is a lie, and that Sony had just flipped a software switch to disable ps2 emulation. Does anyone have any good (non-Sony, non-GeoHot) resources that verify the true situation?

Eddie: No it wasn’t 100% emulted.Only the EE chipset was missing, not the GS chipset.The 80 gig had 1/2 of the hardware needed to be fully BC without any emulation at all.The slims don’t have either chipset at all.  

I am curious about this. GeoHot claimed ten months ago that the chipset stuff is a lie, and that Sony had just flipped a software switch to disable ps2 emulation. Does anyone have any good (non-Sony, non-GeoHot) resources that verify the true situation?

]]> By: Eddie http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/12/30/ps3-private-keys-discovered-homebrewpiracy/#comment-302080 Eddie Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:57:01 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=33990#comment-302080 No it wasn't 100% emulted. Only the EE chipset was missing, not the GS chipset. The 80 gig had 1/2 of the hardware needed to be fully BC without any emulation at all. The slims don't have either chipset at all. No it wasn’t 100% emulted. Only the EE chipset was missing, not the GS chipset. The 80 gig had 1/2 of the hardware needed to be fully BC without any emulation at all.

The slims don’t have either chipset at all.

]]> By: derrickgott007 http://www.ps3blog.net/2010/12/30/ps3-private-keys-discovered-homebrewpiracy/#comment-302079 derrickgott007 Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:51:20 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=33990#comment-302079 The 80gb ps3 didn't have any of the hardware in it. It was 100% emulated and it worked. The software is ALREADY there on the ps3. They just locked it. Now it's unlockable. The 80gb ps3 didn’t have any of the hardware in it. It was 100% emulated and it worked.

The software is ALREADY there on the ps3. They just locked it. Now it’s unlockable.

]]>