Comments on: Battlefield 3 Looks Amazing http://www.ps3blog.net/2011/02/07/battlefield-3-looks-amazing/ Thu, 23 May 2013 06:15:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jay http://www.ps3blog.net/2011/02/07/battlefield-3-looks-amazing/#comment-306388 Jay Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:56:39 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=36975#comment-306388 This looks amazing, Will definately be getting it :) This looks amazing, Will definately be getting it :)

]]> By: Rob http://www.ps3blog.net/2011/02/07/battlefield-3-looks-amazing/#comment-306095 Rob Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:00:47 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=36975#comment-306095 It's either directx 11/12 (which no console supports), or a fake leak of a cinematic to generate buzz. It's funny how the guns clearly have 10000000000 less polygons than the background. It’s either directx 11/12 (which no console supports), or a fake leak of a cinematic to generate buzz. It’s funny how the guns clearly have 10000000000 less polygons than the background.

]]> By: pat http://www.ps3blog.net/2011/02/07/battlefield-3-looks-amazing/#comment-306035 pat Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:39:50 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=36975#comment-306035 its on 360 <blockquote cite="comment-305925"> <strong><a href="#comment-305925" rel="nofollow">Riley</a></strong>: Are these shots from PC? If so, obviously it looks good. If it’s PS3, holy crap! Please confirm?   </blockquote> its on 360

Riley: Are these shots from PC? If so, obviously it looks good. If it’s PS3, holy crap! Please confirm?  

]]> By: yofkla http://www.ps3blog.net/2011/02/07/battlefield-3-looks-amazing/#comment-305996 yofkla Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:11:33 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=36975#comment-305996 looks like any ol' military shooter we've already seen, nothing new here. looks like any ol’ military shooter we’ve already seen, nothing new here.

]]> By: Tosh http://www.ps3blog.net/2011/02/07/battlefield-3-looks-amazing/#comment-305970 Tosh Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:48:57 +0000 http://www.ps3blog.net/?p=36975#comment-305970 Photos are now back. Photos are now back.

]]>